posted on Friday, January 05, 2007 6:01 PM by mike.hlas

Thanks for nothing, Sinclair

I had to see it to believe it, so I had my television on KGAN, the CBS affiliate in Cedar Rapids, at midnight Friday. Sure enough, Channel 2 went black. Actually, it went blue. Black or blue, it's a fight Mediacom subscribers like myself have lost. We now are without a CBS affiliate, a first in my lifetime.


That means no New England-New York Jets football game on Sunday, not that I was going to watch it anyway. But it also means no AFC Championship game in a couple weeks, and no Super Bowl in a month. Oh, no NCAA men's basketball tournament, too.

Why? Because Sinclair Broadcast Group Inc., the owner of KGAN, as well as KDSM in Des Moines and 20 other of its stations around the country that were carried by Mediacom, wanted beaucoup bucks from Mediacom. The two sides never reached an agreement before last night's deadline, thus 800,000 of Mediacom's 1.3 million subscribers are affected. Including me. Which is why I care.

Sinclair says blah, blah, blah, and Mediacom says blah, blah, blah. But while I haven't met a cable company yet that would win any humanitarian awards, and won't hold my breath to wait for my Mediacom bill to get reduced a few bucks because KGAN is no longer offered (though it certainly should), this Sinclair outfit is something else. In 2004, Sinclair refused to allow the eight ABC stations it owned to broadcast an airing of a Nightline tribute to the 721 U.S. soldiers killed up to that time in the 2003 invastion and occupation of Iraq, calling it a "political agenda designed to undermine the efforts of the United States in Iraq." Both supporters and opponents of the war got ticked off at Sinclair for that.

Of course, later that same year Sinclair ordered all of its affiliates to preempt prime-time programming to air a documentary critical of U.S. presidential candidate John Kerry two weeks before the national election. Protests resulted in a more balanced news program being aired.


I'm not going to air a dirty laundry list of some of Sinclair' s actions over the last several years, because you can easily find one elsewhere on the Internet. If you live in an area with a Sinclair station, ask yourself if that station's news operation has improved or worsened since Sinclair's takeover. I know the answer where I live.

For the last several weeks, KGAN ran a large scrawl at the bottom of its programming, offering people a rebate if they switched to DirecTV.  Which is why I can't and won't do it. I'll get around to getting some rabbit ears to pulling in KGAN at home. In the meantime, I'll miss seeing David Letterman's show and "60 Minutes," though I just pretend that I'll miss "60 Minutes" to try to sound like a smart guy. But it's not like CBS is showing "The Office" or "Lost" or "Friday Night Lights" or any of the best prime-time shows on television these days, and it sure doesn't have anything to compare to the best series HBO has to offer.

Just writing this makes me feel pretty foolish, because there are so many real outrages in the world that need drums pounded for them. But when you yank the Super Bowl and NCAA Tournament and the Masters out of my house, you invoke an old Merle Haggard lyric. You're walkin' on the fightin' side of me.

Oh, it just occurred to me that KGAN is the self-titled "Home of the Hawks." That means Mediacom subscribers in Cedar Rapids and other parts of Eastern Iowa won't have access to a large number of University of Iowa men's basketball games. Maybe the Hawkeyes should offer rebates of their own, to try to get television viewers to instead attend their games in person.

Just trying to help. And now, we return to our regularly scheduled programming.


  |    Login or Join to Post Comments

Comments

# re: Thanks for nothing, Sinclair

Saturday, January 06, 2007 3:27 AM by Mother Goose
As usual it comes down to who is greedier the Sinclair or MediaCom.
Sinclair tried to do the same thing in the Des Moines area with the Sinclair Owned FOX station, however that back fired. MediaCom was able to place an different FOX affiliate station on the air and Sinclair lost out. The same thing happened in Iowa City with CBS and MediaCom worked with the CBS affiliate out of Davenport. Who did this hurt in the long run Sinclair.
Unfortunetly Cedar Rapids does not have another CBS station in the area to broadcast.
What does this all prove? Sinclair is out to make money at everyone else's expense. How long will the advertisers put up with losing money?
I guess only time will tell... I just hope time flys by quickly!

# re: Thanks for nothing, Sinclair

Monday, January 08, 2007 7:13 PM by Dale
i like this post. it's tough to take sides between a couple of corporations like this, but i really think sinclair is the bad guy in this fight. kgan is fighting an uphill battle in this market anyway, and this strategy by its corportate parent isn't doing it any favors. who'd buy an ad from this tv station today?

thanks for writing about this situation.

# re: Thanks for nothing, Sinclair

Thursday, January 11, 2007 5:15 AM by Fireboss1
You people are the worst. Every company is in business to make all of the money that they can. If they give things away for free they don't remain in business very long. Mediacom states that they have had it given to them for free for years and it should stay that way. I don't see them giving anyone free cable. They just keep raising their fees and offering less for what they charge. If Mediacom feels that the charge is to high than don't pay it. Otherwise pay the requested fees and shut up. This is a true example of free enterprise and sinclair has the golden product. I for one applaude them for holding their ground.